RateIt by Zipline Survey Builder Redesign

Role

End-to-end product design

Duration

3 months

Organisation type

Start-up

Project year

2020

Context

• RateIt by Zipline is an omni-channel way to capture, analyse and interpret customer feedback, act on what needs improving and grow your enterprise.
• The business problem was that there was high churn
from our customer base.
‍• I interviewed our Customer Service / Experience team and understood that customers weren't learning anything new from their survey responses, so our service was no longer needed.
• Our Big Product Bet was that if we gave customers the option to build and edit their own surveys, that there would be less churn
due to a higher volume of actionable insights.

Design approach

Story-map to build context & scope

By doing this exercise, I understood the breadth and key functionality of a Survey Builder. Things like “text piping”, “conditional logic” etc.

Market analysis to build context & prioritisation

I looked at the market leader, Qualtrics, and free tools such as SurveyMonkey and Google Forms. Our product scope and experience would sit somewhere in the middle. We wouldn't be a fully mature product straight away, but people were going to pay for our tool, so it had to be better than free tools.

I reviewed the tiering of features and expected pricing.

Role-play creating a survey to build empathy

It’s always easier to understand a problem by doing it. 

Review existing research to understand usability issues / jobs-to-be-done

Example issue 1
Randomisation (a feature that enables survey-to-survey rotation through a bank of questions) was only available on one question type, restricting a CX consultant's ability to cover more questions in a study.​

If I’m a CX consultant, I may need to cover 15 questions in a study, but consumers are prone to answering only 3-4 questions per survey.​ I can use the randomisation feature to ensure I cover a credible survey sample size AND a larger set of questions, which means I can provide organisations with greater insight from the study.​

Solution
Provide randomisation functionality on all 11 question types.
Example issue 2
A "previous" and "next" question needed to be manually assigned to each new question. A previous developer was concerned with the complexities of logic branching, but it created a more complex experience for the user.

Solution
Assign a default question order and walk developers through a model where the default order makes assumptions that inform the branching logic. The user could still edit the assumptions that the system made.

Create design variations for critique

I quickly ran design concepts past CX team members at the side of their desks to understand whether a concept I proposed would help or hinder their workflow.

AI-assisted workflow

Use Figma AI’s First Draft function
Generate multiple concepts at speed. Incorporate feedback from the CX team into the prompts.

Outcomes

Quant
• 75%+ reduction in the cost to serve each customer.
Creating and editing surveys is where the customer service team spent most of their time.
• Customer churn metrics were affected by COVID but lead to a gargantuan pivot and the launch of a now-profitable 0-1 Aged Care product suite.